Composite dialogue only after Pakistan’s action

Source: The Hindu
Sandeep Dikshit
“Ready to discuss
Balochistan as we have a clear conscience”
NEW DELHI: Having started a “limited dialogue,” India was
not keen on meeting the Pakistani insistence that the
composite dialogue be resumed, till it was convinced not
only of Islamabad’s sincerity in taking action against the
perpetrators of the previous attacks but also of its
motivation to prevent attacks like the one that occurred in
Mumbai, said South Block sources.
Even if the limited dialogue was to go beyond the Foreign
Secretary-level talks, India would refrain from restarting
the composite dialogue format because Pakistan had not kept
its promise, made in January 2004, of dismantling the
terrorist training infrastructure. “There have been attacks
after attacks after that pledge,” the sources said.
Denying that Pakistan submitted any dossier on Indian
involvement in Balochistan, they pointed out that the only
paper given by Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir on the night
of July 14 at Sharm-el-Sheikh (Egypt) was titled “After the
attacks in Mumbai.” It was a “bland” listing of the actions
taken by Islamabad to “make it look that it had worked
hard.”
On the India-Pakistan joint statement uncoupling the
composite dialogue from action taken against the
perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks, India felt this would
ensure that action against terrorism was not held hostage to
the composite dialogue. In future, Pakistan could not say
because there was no composite dialogue no action could be
taken.
“The fact is that it [joint statement] was drafted in
bits and pieces. It was supposed to be reflective of what
was discussed and since Pakistan Prime Minister Yusuf Raza
Gilani had mentioned Balochistan we had no problem in
leaving it in. We would be happy to discuss Balochistan
because we have clean hands and a clear conscience,” the
sources maintained.
On the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Agency chief
Shuja Pasha’s offer to negotiate with India, they said India
would tread carefully. “It is not the man but the
institution. ISI is an important part of the Pakistani
establishment but it is also the source of trouble for
India. We will have to look at this offer carefully because
the noise to signal ratio in Pakistan is very high.”
|