In
order to lead a good life man should live in obey
the State. But political obligation always subject
with the factor of moral adequacy of state and the
consent of people. But the both important elements
are missing in Iran and Pakistan in such situation
right to resistance should be substituted by the
duty to disobey, to resist political authority in
the event of cruel necessity, a revolt against the
abuse of political authority is justified against
the twin States, cogent reason is that it is
sanctioned by the force of public conscience of
Baloch Nation as whole. Political obligation without
the element of consent and hypothetically social
contract on which the entire structure of political
obligation is rest, in the absence of all these
elements In Iran and Pakistan the Baloch people is
not bound to obey the coercion authority of them.
People are the maker of state; both are banana and
theocratic Republics. Which does not meet the needs
of 21th century; it would be relevant to mention
here that the fundamental laws preambles which are
based on medieval, Islamic injunction enshrined and
flawed jurisprudence and a significant numbers of
substantive provisions, which are derived from
draconian laws, are incorporated in Iran and
Pakistan constitutions. On account of which
dogmatism emerged, as a menace. Due to bigotry
culture, in referred States the minority are
suffering and facing hardship, Shias and Ahmadi’s
are being persecuted in Pakistan while Sunni are not
freed from the rage and fury of Shias. Baloch are an
ethnic Nation as well as Sunni minority and their
motherland and resources have been forcibly annexed.
None of them are democrat countries. All
institutions are under minded by the security
establishments. Rather the armies of both states are
milbus. Politician and parliaments are subordinate
and puppet to them. Under this environment fighting
for the cause of emancipation from alien yoke,
Baloch could not get liberty by constitutional
methods because Iran and Pakistan are not secular
and democratic countries like Western and European,
namely Britain, France and United State. The
policies of both States are being formulated by
security establishment. In this spirit no other
option is lift for Baloch except to employ and adapt
the methods of resistance. Since, without the
consent of Baloch and not being a signatory of any
social contract in building of Iran and Pakistan
States. Wrong done by the Pakistan and Iran States
of such serious nature it’s self demands resistance
rather than obligation. In such situation, Question
arises whether we Baloch should blindly to worship
the authorities of Pakistan and Iran. Under the
prevailing environment and ground it would be
justified to Baloch do not be obedient because the
both referred States without the consent of Baloch
invaded and occupied their native and motherland
forcibly, hence the Baloch has locus standi to
resist and restore the original position their land.
In this direction the International law, norms and
other many resolutions were adapted by United
Nation.
By
virtue of which the deprived Nations are entitled to
struggle for their liberation and independence.
Especially the resolution of 7 December 1987 is a
milestone for deprived Nations. Which even jealously
safe guard’s the movement of the right of self
determination, freedom and independent. Also the
referred resolution distinguished the boundary line
of National liberation movements and terrorism.
In
order to lead a good life man should live in obey
the State. But political obligation always subject
with the factor of moral adequacy of state and the
consent of people. But the both important elements
are missing in Iran and Pakistan in such situation
right to resistance should be substituted by the
duty to disobey, to resist political authority in
the event of cruel necessity, a revolt against the
abuse of political authority is justified against
the twin States, cogent reason is that it is
sanctioned by the force of public conscience of
Baloch Nation as whole. Political obligation without
the element of consent and hypothetically social
contract on which the entire structure of political
obligation is rest, in the absence of all these
elements In Iran and Pakistan the Baloch people is
not bound to obey the coercion authority of them.
People are the maker of state; both are banana and
theocratic Republics. Which does not meet the needs
of 21th century; it would be relevant to mention
here that the fundamental laws preambles which are
based on medieval, Islamic injunction enshrined and
flawed jurisprudence and a significant numbers of
substantive provisions, which are derived from
draconian laws, are incorporated in Iran and
Pakistan constitutions. On account of which
dogmatism emerged, as a menace. Due to bigotry
culture, in referred States the minority are
suffering and facing hardship, Shias and Ahmadi’s
are being persecuted in Pakistan while Sunni are not
freed from the rage and fury of Shias. Baloch are an
ethnic Nation as well as Sunni minority and their
motherland and resources have been forcibly annexed.
None of them are democrat countries. All
institutions are under minded by the security
establishments. Rather the armies of both states are
milbus. Politician and parliaments are subordinate
and puppet to them. Under this environment fighting
for the cause of emancipation from alien yoke,
Baloch could not get liberty by constitutional
methods because Iran and Pakistan are not secular
and democratic countries like Western and European,
namely Britain, France and United State. The
policies of both States are being formulated by
security establishment. In this spirit no other
option is lift for Baloch except to employ and adapt
the methods of resistance. Since, without the
consent of Baloch and not being a signatory of any
social contract in building of Iran and Pakistan
States. Wrong done by the Pakistan and Iran States
of such serious nature it’s self demands resistance
rather than obligation. In such situation, Question
arises whether we Baloch should blindly to worship
the authorities of Pakistan and Iran. Under the
prevailing environment and ground it would be
justified to Baloch do not be obedient because the
both referred States without the consent of Baloch
invaded and occupied their native and motherland
forcibly, hence the Baloch has locus standi to
resist and restore the original position their land.
In this direction the International law, norms and
other many resolutions were adapted by United
Nation. 
By
virtue of which the deprived Nations are entitled to
struggle for their liberation and independence.
Especially the resolution of 7 December 1987 is a
milestone for deprived Nations. Which even jealously
safe guard’s the movement of the right of self
determination, freedom and independent. Also the
referred resolution distinguished the boundary line
of National liberation movements and terrorism.
