Character Assassination of Hafeez Hassan Abadi

2009/11/11

Archen Baloch said...

The person commenting on Hafeez Hasanabadi’s writing on Dr.Malik and Hillary Clinton’s meeting, is just trying to defame Mr.Hafeez rather than debating on the subject. All the above allegations on Hafeez by this person are just rubbish and senseless. Regarding Hafeez-Raziq friendship, no one being an old BSO member can say they never were friend of Raziq Bugti. He was BSO’s chairman and was representing BSO in Kabul, so it is obvious for BSO senior members to have relation with him. If being Changez’s brother doesn’t stops Hayrbyar from his freedom struggle, Talal Bugti being Brahmdagh’s uncle cant stop Brahmdagh from his freedom struggle so Hafeez and Raziq’s “hi,hello” friendship does matter in this field? Hafeez has a ‘man of his word’ kind of personality and such allegations are just rubbish against him. Remember, Hafeez is living in Russia since 1997 and is earning his bread there to feed his family.
Similarly, Israr Zehri and Mohd Ali Rind’s friendship with Hafeez has been mentioned. Israr and Hafeez friendship is possible because both are of same age but Mohd Ali Rind’s friendship with Hafeez is just showing that the commenter is just talking whatever his ears hear. Anyways if Israr Zehri and Mohd Ali Rind friendship is bad and able to be criticized so the fingers would’ve pointed to those who were really close to them like Hasil Bizanjo, Tahir Bizanjo, Aslam Bizanjo etc. who were working with them in their government and who are still officials of Dr Malik’s party. These people are very close to Israr and Rind rather than Hafeez being that close. People who were along with Israr and Rind being senators and ministers are sitting next to Dr.Malik and during Israr and Rind’s ministry the person who was searching for employment in Russia is no one else than Hafeez. What is this friendship? What is this closeness?
Similarly the commenter wrote that Hafeez started writing just after Raziq’s death. This point also shows that the commenter is just bluffing in air. Dear! Hafeez is writing since 1993 in the politics world. He was the administrator of ‘Mahnama Balochistan’ which was later on shut down during Akhter Mengal’s government. It was a pure political newspaper. One of the main reasons of shutting the newspaper down was that it used to criticize the pro-parliamentarians thoughts even at that time. In 1996-97 Hafeez intended to get Akhter Mengal’s government’s attention that Akhter’s party before coming into power had the agenda of self-determination, so why was it silent now? Similarly he continuously criticized that Akhter’s party’s constitution had the point of implementing Balochi as Balochistan’s official language but it was quiet while it had the chance.

November 11, 2009 11:06 AM

Archen Baloch said...

The commenter wrote that Dr Malik has bravely talked about Balochistan issue with Hillary Clinton. Dear! Nowadays such lies don’t survive, people are more matured than ever. When India started Balochistan debate Hillary stated that India wasn’t involved in Balochistan. If Dr. Malik would’ve spoken about Baloch issue in the meeting it would’ve obviously been covered by any of the media channels, but no such statement appeared even days after the meeting. I think the reason of Malik’s not giving any statement is that he might have been thinking if he lied that he talked about Baloch issue in the meeting, on the other hand Hillary could’ve rejected these claims. So he couldn’t dare to give any such statement but the commenter did dare.
You have written that Hafeez is trying to divide Baloch. I have read around 190 articles of Hafeez in Urdu and Balochi based on Baloch and Balochistan’s political issues. We didn’t find any theory of division of Baloch in any of his writings. One thing that he usually writes is to differentiate Baloch political workers from useless bluff master leaders so that Baloch nation remains in safe hands till it gets its freedom.
The commenter mentions Hafeez being Islamabad’s agent is a similar lie as Pakistani officials always say that they are in contact with Hayrbyar and Brahmdagh but none of their claim is true. The commenter seems to be colleague of those who used to accuse Shaheed Ghulam Mohd being agent of Pakistani agencies. Even whenever Shaheed Ghulam Mohd was abducted by the agencies such people used to spread false rumors that Shaheed was having good hospitality by ISI and MI.
The commenter should now try to debate on the given subject so that the published article’s understanding becomes easier rather than hiding his friends sins and to defame others. Therefore, any person who appraises pro-Pakistani people like Dr Malik and calls personalities like Shaheed Ghulam Mohd and Hafeez Hasanabadi as agents must think before. We pro-liberators call Hafeez as true freedom fighter. This is to be remembered and not to be forgotten

http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2009/11/dr-maliks-meeting-with-hilary-clinton.html