- Insist of participation in Baloch national
movement and repeating of false interpretations
of right terms...
-
- By Hafeez
Hassanabadi
- Translated by
Zrombesht Baloch
-
Saturday, September 04, 2010
- (translated from the original proof,
correction included)
-
- Following the orders
of Baloch massacre in Noshrowan and going
through an indiscriminate trail of murders, the
Baloch is once again facing a big scrutiny. In
today’s scientific world the perdition of a
nation is very easy due to human necessities and
lethal weapons being in arms reach. Iran and
Pakistan keeping this in mind have started an
undeclared genocide of Baloch nation making
their lives even miserable.
- The Baloch has slam
its everything in this current war of survival
and they have no other option left. The reason
is even if it approves the allegiance of Iran
and Pakistan it still faces the same threats so
the Baloch got an only arduous path of freedom
which it is traveling through. In even such
dreadful situation some Baloch political parties
wile by pretending and try to be apart of the
struggle. Not everyday cases of young Balochs
going missing could gain attention to let such
people think for a while neither hanging bodies
on the trees could open their eyes nor
unidentifiable bodies’ sky tearing outcry could
not jolt their Balochism.
- Even witnessing
perdition all around, these people still do not
get tired in calling unity (just vocal calls).
Even though the circumstances have cleared it
long ago that anyone should participate in the
struggle according to their strength
respectively. Apparently this situation is above
the thinking of an ordinary Baloch that we all
talk about Baloch and Balochistan but why are we
unable to agree on this single point of saving
our motherland first and then everyone preach
their own ideas.
- All sharing the same
hope, why moving on different paths even if
sharing the same destination?
- This is the basic
point that has been discussed several times but
the need of discussing it more is because
following the including parties of BNF, now BNP
Mengal’s few leaders being direct victims of
state target killings. Feeling the intensity of
such political leaders being victim of direct
state indignation, National Party too sometimes
issues statements of its party leaders being
unsafe.
- Although the peaceful
political struggle claimer National Party’s (NP)
role is as that running jackal of the jungle who
after hearing the news of elephants massacre
orders runs.
- Someone asked:
‘Everything okay Jackal? Why are you running?!’
- the jackal replied:
‘Dear! The king has ordered to kill all the
elephants!’
- the questioner asked
curiously: ‘The king ordered to kill the
elephants, you are a jackal, why do you have to
run?!’
- The jackal thought
argument with this “muddleheaded person” was
just waste of time, he continued running saying:
‘Who knows someone misunderstands us as an
elephant child and kill us!’
- Previously if parties
included in BNF were direct targets of state
infuriation, now BNP Mengal too is included in
the list enlarging the list of martyrs for a
useless demand as right of self-determination.
- In this stereography
we will try to consider the possibilities of the
reasons being hurdle in forming any kind of
coalition among these parties.
- If a glitzy look is
given to the circumstances, BNP Mengal should
not have any problem in joining with the
pro-independence but a deep-laid consideration
leads this is only possible if along BNP Mengal
all other parties are hitch at a point which is
called harmoniousness.
- Unfortunately the
meanings of words and terms have changed in
their neighboring. These parties will not be
effective for the pro-independence or
cooperative for homeland’s independence till
they don’t dare to use the real meanings of the
terms.
- For example when Nawab
Khair Baksh Marri quotes Baloch nation should
get ready to die for the sake of its survival,
the meaning of this statement is taken as it is
and Nawab Khair Baksh clears thinking Baloch
nation’s survival is just combined with its
independence and it (the Baloch) has to slam its
everything in order to get rid of the Punjabis
and the Gajars (Fars). And if a similar
statement is issued by Sardar Ataullah Mengal,
the next or the coming day a defining note is
issued from any corner on the newspapers stating
the center should let go all and keep just 3
administrations under it. As if the term ‘Dying’
means extensive provincial autonomy in their
neighborhood. They define it ‘provincial
autonomy’ or ‘right of self-determination’ it
doesn’t matters because their demand is so clear
that it could never be mixed up with the demand
of independence in fact terming it right of
self-determination would be an enhancement.
- Regarding Baloch
genocide such statements are considered equal
e.g. accounting this genocide no
pro-independence has ever accused Pakistani
establishment, it has always accused the state
for this barbarism. Whereas the pro-parliaments
under their blanket of slavery backwardness
accuse the establishment. Very rarely in Baloch
society under some political pressure such
elements use the term of ‘slavery’ but recommend
a different solution to it. Are they so literary
doltish that they do not know the solution of
slavery is freedom? Or else this possibility
will always remain that they will participate in
elections and their own structure of provincial
government is their aim.
- When pro-independence
call for ensemble ways of struggle they mean
along with the armed struggle all democratic
methods in shape of demonstrations and public
gatherings so that more and more people are
aware of Pakistani states’ bad deeds and are
convinced to participate in Balochistan’s
independence. Whereas the exact same
statement’s meaning taken by the pro-parliaments
is to let the armed struggle carry on in the
mountains and they shall support them in the
parliament. Stating so they forget their
participation in the parliament is exact
inconvenient of the armed strugglers in the
freedom movement. Their participation in
parliament advocates Pakistani colonization on
Balochistan legalizing and yielding it. Even
though they are well aware of the fact of
participation in the struggle is possible
without staying in power but they would never do
so because they have accepted the division and
occupation of Baloch land. Such people’s demands
are not more than ‘hail he who gives, hail he
who doesn’t!’
- Both the
pro-independence and pro-parliaments express
their will of negotiation with the Pakistani
state but the definition of negotiation among
both varies. When pro-independence express the
will of talks they mean single point agenda of
independence while the other colleagues mean it
as extensive controls giving it another name
calling upon Saudi Arabia, UAE or sometimes the
UN to play a third party role. Besides keeping
such demands they still are not clear. It can be
easily concluded by considering the comments of
BNP’s former senator once on a TV program how he
had scrolled down Balochistan’s independence
issue to Musharraf-Nawaz grievance handing it
over to an Arab Shaikh.
- In the missing persons
issue the stands of both the parties contexts
differ. For the pro-independence, the issue of
missing persons is as important as the question
along that the missing persons are in worse
conditions in the torture cells because of their
demand of a great motive. Whereas according to
the pro-parliaments the release of missing
persons is necessary in order to reinstate
confidence among the Balochs and the state so
that they could again use the Baloch name and
face no hurdles in talking to Islamabad being
sorry for what all happened and assuring it
never repeat. The reason is if their demands are
not agreed to Islamabad it is possible they are
later on disappeared and martyred like Ghulam
Mohd and his colleagues.
- ‘Martyrs blood will go
no waste’ keeps dual definition in both the
fields. The pro-independence say so with the
motive of the independence of Balochistan. The
pro-parliaments mean to collect more and more
vote under this term. Our explanation of terms
might shock some friends but this is the truth
because these people coming for elections will
surely mention the sacrifices of their martyrs.
Perceptively or unperceptive they will convert
the blood of their martyrs as a begging pot
asking people to put their votes in which is
direct collision to the Baloch national freedom
movement.
- ‘No more to iniquity’
bear dual meaning among both as well.
Pro-independence saying so defend with full
force while pro-parliaments have been saying so
continuously since last 5 years but in practical
the result out is no more than some photo
sessions in front of Press Clubs or on some
special occasions speaking on the stage as if
the meaning of ‘no more to iniquity’ is to wait
for another incident.
- The meaning of ‘We all
are brothers’ has been changed too.
Pro-independence mean all those people who are
aware of their homeland slavery and want to see
it independent. The pro-parliaments calling all
the Balochs as brothers mean not to point out
the opportunists. Could any brotherhood be seen
between Dr. Allah Nizar or Nawab Brahmdagh Bugti
and any Pakistani parliament’s MPA, MNA,
Senator, District and Divisional officer who one
being in power holds meeting with Secretaries,
DCSPs etc. on a daily basis and the other holds
his life in his hand in the battlefield fighting
against the occupation.
- When pro-independence
leader Mr. Hayrbyar Marri mentions Pakistan
being powerful it means Baloch nation should get
steady and clever in the ongoing war and he
knows the enemy is strong but could be defeated
by correct tactics used. Whereas the same
sentence used by the pro-parliaments means
Pakistan is undefeatable and we should reject
the demand of freedom. This is where the
pro-independence believe to strengthen the armed
struggle in the freedom movement and Pakistani
parliament seekers keep their selves busy in
bonding relationships.
- In this short
discussion we easily come to the conclusion that
there is a huge difference of paths and motives
between Pakistani parliament seekers and the
pro-independence. Nevertheless following BNF the
state seems to be trying to jolt BNP Mengal.
Which means the state is well aware of the
clashes of thoughts between the leaders and the
workers of this group and one after another is
targeting its workers who are the supporters of
Baloch freedom fighters in themselves. In such
upcoming situation it cannot be overruled that
those members of NP are too targeted who against
their party are committed to support the freedom
movement. It means Pakistani parliament seekers
keeping in mind the true meanings of terms,
honestly analyzing the circumstances and
incidents should for the sake of Baloch nation
survival war join those forces who are directly
involved in the struggle. Thus it is known the
day Baloch parties decide to cut off relations
with Pakistan, the next day all the terms,
phrases and sentences will have the true
meanings among them paving the ways of extent
unity. Or else a silly Punjabi may misunderstand
the jackal as an elephant child and kill it!
-
Sep. 3rd 2010
|
