Nov09

Baloch case in the United Kingdom

4 دسمبر 2009 By admin 1 views
Baloch case in the United Kingdom

Two years of the Baloch case in the United Kingdom – bail money still

Exactly two years ago from today in London, three places were raided by the

British Anti Terrorism Command (also known as SO15) from the new Scotland

Yard simultaneously in the areas of Ealing, Wembley and Hunger lane. Two of

the houses belonged to Hybyair Marri a Baloch leader and son of prominent

Baloch leader Nawab Khair Baksh Marri. At the time of the raid Mr Marri was

residing at his Ealing house and Faiz Baluch was living at the Wembley

house.   Baloch leader Hybyair Marri and activist Faiz Baloch were

apparently arrested on behalf of the government of Pakistan ‘Musharraf’s

 Their arrest took place soon after Shaheed Balaach Marri’s assassination on

 20 November 2007; it was probably a good opportunity for the Pakistan

 government as they had got rid of one Marri and wanted to get rid of the

 other Marri. From 23 November up to the arrest of Hyrbyair Marri and Faiz

 Baluch, the British security forces installed secret camera in front of

 their houses and flow them everywhere. All the well-wishers and friends who

 had come to pay their respect to Balaach Marri had been filmed by the secret

 cameras and later the prosecution tried to say that these people were

 gathering to make some sinister plans.

  The Baloch activists were taken to the high security Paddington Green

 police station for interrogation. Later it came to public notice that they

 had been charged under terrorism act 2000, *there were four charges

 against each of the Baloch activists, which were as follows; **1)

 Possession of an article for a purpose connected with the commission,

 preparation and instigation of an act of terrorism – contrary to section 57

 of terrorism act 2000. 2) Collecting information of a kind likely to be

 useful to a person for committing or preparing acts of terrorism – contrary

 to section 58 of terrorism act 2000. 3) Preparation of terrorist acts –

 contrary section 5 of terrorism act 2005. 4) Incitement to commit an act or

 acts of terrorism – contrary to section 59 of terrorism act 2000.  Additionally

 Mr. Marri had been charged with possessing a CS Gas canister which comes

 under fire arm act. *

 After one week of interrogation and isolation Baloch activists had formally

 been charged and sent to Britain’s notorious, high security prison Belmarsh

 for awaiting trial to prove their innocence.  Belmarsh is the toughest

 prison and a place for high risk criminals. Mr Marri and Baluch were treated

 as Category ‘A’ prisoners ‘a threat to general public that means’. An A

 Category prisoner is not allowed to have any visits without a formal

 invitation approved by the Home Office, prisoners of this category are also

 striped searched ‘which is a degrading process, specially for a Baloch’

 after any visits to their legal teams, coming back from gym, work or for any

 reason if they go out from their cells on their way back they are strip

 searched.  Cat ‘A’ prisoners are also locked in isolated cells ‘often

 known as single cells’.

 After spending almost 5 month in prison Mr Hyrbyair Marri was released on

 bail on very strict conditions, he was not allowed to attend any political

 meeting regarding Balochistan, he was not allowed to speak to the media, he

 was not allowed to phone Balochistan, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan, he had

 to wear a tag at all times, he was not allowed to leave home between 8pm to

 8am and he had to report to a police station every day. Same conditions were

 attached with Faiz Baluch’s bail when he was released a couple of months

 after Mr Marri release. In addition Faiz had to answer to a “Voice

 Recognition Machine” call every midnight.  Apart from these conditions Mr

 Marri had paid nearly £300,000 cash as security, that money had been

 deposited to the court’s account until any decision is made regarding his

 case, and if Mr Marri fled the country the money would be seized by the

 government or Court. After any decision regarding the case the money would

 and should be returned to those who stood as Mr Marri’s security.

 However, in Mr Marri’s case that did not happen, in fact the UK government

 has not paid Mr Marri’s bail money back after his acquittal in February

 2008. Although the money was paid by several friends and well-wishers of Mr

 Marri but after his release Mr Marri paid back to all of his friends with

 difficulty. All the people who had got their money back from Mr Marri wrote

 to the CPS and to the court that the money should now be paid to Mr. Marri.

 The police and court are now denying paying Marri’s bail money using

 different lame excuses. To Hyrbyair Marri it seems “legal blunder”. He

 thinks the UK government is still acting on behalf of Pakistani intelligence

 agencies and to trying to make financial difficulties for him. In the 70s

 Pakistan confiscated lands, took the vehicles of Hyrbyair’s family in order

 to weaken them financially and to force them to succumb to Pakistan

 government pressure.  Hyrbyair Marri believes the UK government seems to

 be doing exactly the same today.

 Despite all the difficulties Hyrbyair Marri is determined that such

 pressure tactics cannot stop him for campaigning for his country’s

 Independence. He continues to advocate freedom, after his release he has

 been actively taking part in protests, public gathering and spoke to media

 regarding Baloch cause. His view is that Balochistan was forcefully occupied

 and the occupation must come to an end. He believes in dialogue and finding

 a peaceful solution to Balochistan’s problem but he is adamant that the

 occupiers of Baloch land must withdraw unconditionally and immediately.  He

 insists that Independence of Balochistan must be a part of any dialogue with

 Pakistan to resolve Balochistan issue and negotiations must be guaranteed

 and observed by international guarantors.

admin

Written by admin